Subject	Man, I'm a whore on so many levels! Multi-whore...
Posted by	SeedyRom on May 10, 2001 at 11:05 PM
	This message has been viewed 14 times.
In Reply To	for all you photo whores (ie. seedy, gr) >> posted by maverick (NYC) on May 10, 2001 at 09:47 PM
Message	LOL. As got rice said, the little bit extra for $400-$500 for a DSC-S50 is WELL worth it. 2.1 megapixel is more than enough for almost anything and it has features galore. I take all mine with it. Vote on my Z on www.cardomain.com! Fords are killing us! Zheaven.com is back *UP* completely! 04/13/01 -- Click my Z below to enter.
Follow Ups	for all you photo whores (ie. seedy, gr) >> - maverick (NYC) 21:47:23 05/10/01 Re: kodak 3400 $399(or less)kodak 4300(I think)$499 - nissanlord 21:56:40 05/10/01 get at least a 2.1 MP.... no 1.3 (n/m) - 97 S14 21:58:18 05/10/01 Ditto! - Chazz 03:37:30 05/11/01 $300-350 - got rice? 21:58:23 05/10/01 Man, I'm a whore on so many levels! Multi-whore... - SeedyRom 23:05:56 05/10/01 Re: Man, I'm a whore on so many levels! Multi-whore... - Arturo C. 09:41:22 05/11/01 Most of the Sony's do the movie thing. I have > - FiremanZ 07:21:40 05/11/01 survey says.. - got rice? [not Amish] 07:57:29 05/11/01 Check this web site out. Compares all cameras out there> - Xi0nX4 (ohio) 18:59:21 05/11/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.